Sometimes I come across something that is so unbelievably obvious I can't believe that it is being reported on as news.<br />n<br />n<a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/japan_earthquake_prediction">Major Tokyo Quake Expected Within 50 Years</a><br />n<br />nNow as seismically active as the Japan area is this prediction to me gets a "duh, no s–t" type response from me. Then I read the first paragraph.<br />n<br />n<i>Japan's capital has a 90 percent chance of being devastated by a major earthquake some time in the next 50 years, according to a study by a government panel. </i><br />n<br />nThis is no different than me predicting there is a 90% chance that in the next 10 years it will rain where I live. It is probable a real good bet, even though I would have to wonder at the moment. I sure hope I get rain in that time frame, if I don't I sure enough won't be ranching here. I wonder what the members of this "government panel" were paid to make this stupendous announcement? Had to have been a political payoff of some kind.<br />n<br />n<b>He who lives by the crystal ball soon learns to eat ground glass. Edgar R. Fiedler</b>
Duh
by
Tags: