The petition says the NPRC "has gone to excessive and obstructive lengths" in its "self-assumed watchdog role in the development and utilization of various natural resources in our state." It accuses Northern Plains of aligning itself with "radical environmentalists" whose goal is to wipe out agriculture with the aim of "rewilding" large areas of land.
I seen this in the paper this morning about a group who supports the CBM development and while I don't support the development, I do agree with the quote that NPRC is in bed with the "radical environmentalists" and has a goal of reducing the agricultural potential of the land.
I know quite a few of the people in the NPRC mostly by reputation and their views about agriculture and the environment are flat scary. While I don't support CBM development, I will continue to be fairly quite on the issue because of the NPRC's involvement in the issue. I don't want to be seen in bed with such a radical organization.
A radical generally meant a man who thought he could somehow pull up the root without affecting the flower. Gilbert Keith Chesterton












I don't know anything about the Fischer-Tropsch technology which produces oil from coal, but it sounds too good to be true. Schweitzer envisions a plant where the state-owned Otter Creek coal reserves are located in Powder River County. It would cost $
Tracked: May 21, 02:38